You could investigate the OfType method, it filters based on type: using System.Linq; ... foreach(var door in tileList.OfType<Door>()) { door.Toggle(); }

This line: std::cout << &myFSM.getTopNode(); probably prints the address of a temporary object, not the actual object in the vector. This will be true if you're not returning by reference but rather by value. So it's not weird if the temporary happens to be created at the same location each time, since after the temporary dies, its location in memory is free to be used again later. In order to get the actual object rather than a copy of it, getTopNode() needs to do: Node& FSM::getTopNode() { if (nodeList.empty()) { // Up to you how to handle this error. } return nodeList.back(); } Of course, if your current getTopNode() implementation actually already returns a pointer: Node* FSM::getTopNode() then your problem is that you're printing out the ad

How about an inversion of control system? You could make a global IOC object that has instructions for creating an object, but that also has a registry that contains references to already created objects. In the registration portion of the module for each item that you want to behave "singletonny", you simply check to see if it's already been instantiated. The only other option I can think of is that since you aren't looking to construct anything, make it a static class that you can't instantiate and access the class statically (Calendar::printSomeFunction). I am not, however, opposed to the singleton pattern, for what it's worth, when it's used correctly. I just choose more elegant solutions such as #1 here, because it is very flexible. You don't however have much control over whether or

Within your iterator function, this will be the matching DOM element. That element has a className property with a space-delimited list of the classes on the element. There may well be more than one, unless you know in your markup that there will only be one. If only one, just use this.className directly. var newclass = this.className; If more than one, you may find jQuery's hasClass function useful: var $this = $(this); if ($this.hasClass('effect1')) { // ... } else if ($this.hasClass('effect2') { // ... } // ... But, if you want to do different things depending on which class the element matched, it probably makes more sense to break up your query. Then you may not even need each, if you're trying to do something to all elements matching a given class. For example: jQu

You were using an incorrect selector - a [class] is all anchors with a class as a descendant. Basically, any element descending from an <a>, which starts with or contains the class icon- will be targeted. What you want is to select all anchors starting with or containing that class themselves - a[class]: a[class^="icon-"], a[class*=" icon-"] { text-decoration: none; color: #1BA1E2; } jsFiddle example here.

Create validateXxx methods where Xxx is the name of the related action method. (Whether or not this is the best option depends on the particular validations you need.)

let the IDE create the function itself. Look like you wrote it by yourself as I see you don't have the @Override annotation. try delete your onItemClick function and let the eclipse/intellij/whatever it is to do it for you. you should see it with the annotation: @Override public void onItemClick(AdapterView<?> adapterView, View view, int i, long l) { } If this still not working (can't see why not) try it anonymously: g.setOnItemClickListener(new AdapterView.OnItemClickListener() { @Override public void onItemClick(AdapterView<?> adapterView, View view, int i, long l) { // your logic here... } }); For the second question, seems that the system using lots of memory when you're loading and sets image resource. I would suggest

Use below command: export CLASSPATH="$CLASSPATH:xyz.jar**:**path_to_abc.jar.jar" You basically have to append to the classpath, all the new entries that you want. To do so, just make use of ':' in linux and ';' in windows.

If you define ObjectB as a ClassBInterface2 it won't be possible to convert it to ClassBInterface1 at runtime because it's internal structure won't be known. Your way is the best one to do it but you can do a little modification. You don't need to do a explicit cast from ClassB to ClassBInterface1 while calling ObjectC.Bar because the compiler will do it for you. If class B is defined as follows: ClassB : public ClassBInterface1, ClassBInterface2 { /*Class methods and attributes*/ } you can just do the following while calling the Bar function on the ObjectC (assuming objectB is defined as ClassB) ObjectC.Bar(ObjectB);

I never look at the code of kinetic group. But this problem could happen if the code uses closure to create private variables like this: Kinetic.Group = function(){ var setX, getX; (function() { var X = 0; getX = function(){ return X ; }; setX = function(v){ X = v; }; })(); this.setX = setX; this.getX = getX; } When you declare Enemy.prototype = new Kinetic.Group();, there is only 1 Kinetic.Group created. When you call this.setX(position.posX); inside function Enemy(position, rotation), because this function does not exist in the current instance, it will look up that function in the prototype property (the same Kinetic.Group for all your Enemy). All your instances created by the constructor function share the

This may be overkill for your use case, but for notifying classes about events I use an event bus (specifically https://github.com/greenrobot/EventBus). This allows you to simply post a message and every class that has registered to receive that type of message gets it. Very simple to use, and pretty small as far as libraries go.

Assuming Comparators are not working(which i'm curious as to how they're not working), or you simply don't want to use one, you could write a wrapper class that has an instance of your original class as data. ex. public class HorsesWrapper implements Comparable<HorsesWrapper> { private Horses horses; public int compareTo(HorsesWrapper other) { // your sort criteria based on the Horse member. } }

Instead of doing an Angular version you could just create a css classes of .upload .checkbox etc.. that map to the icon-* <li ng-repeat="el in elm.required"> <i tooltip="{{el.name}}" class="{{el.type}}" ng-class="{'muted':!el.completed}" ></i> </li> Example on jsfiddle

Each time you click labelButton it is firing a repaint event for MyDrawPanel. This causes the color to be randomly generated again, changing the color of MyDrawPanel. I suggest fixing this by calling a method from ColorListener on MyDrawPanel which changes its color. This will keep the panel from changing color every repaint. And here's precisely how to do it: class ColorListener implements ActionListener{ MyDrawPanel colorPanel; public ColorListener(MyDrawPanel panel){ this.colorPanel = panel; } public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent event2) { colorPanel.generateRandomColor(); frame.repaint(); } } public class MyDrawPanel extends JPanel{ GradientPaint gradient; public MyDrawPanel(){ generateRandomColor(); } publi

A class can not belong to two different namespaces. If you want to refer to a class of the Engine or Core namespaces without explicitly writing the namespace each time you reference a type of those namespaces, just use using at the beginning of the file. The using directive allows the use of types in a namespace so that you do not have to qualify the use of a type in that namespace: using Engine; or using Core; Check the documentation: using Directive

It seems to me that you should separate the concern of holding the data from validating the data - as the latter is context-specific. You may well want to put some "core" validation into Address, but then separate out the other validators into ContactAddressValidator and VendorAddressValidator classes (possibly implementing some sort of Validator<T> interface). This is the same approach as you take to sort the same type in different ways, implementing Comparator<T> multiple times for the same T, but in different classes.

One options is to exclude the library project from the build in one of the projects. Library project dependencies are stored in the Android Private Libraries classpath container in Eclipse/ADT. In the latest ADT (and probably in older versions to), you can opt to not export this classpath container. Imagine the scenario were you have a project depending on the Google Play Services Library. android-maps-utils (A google maps extension library project that also depends on Google Play Services) In this case you will run into the following error at package/deploy time : Unable to execute dex: Multiple dex files define Lcom/google/android/gms/R$attr; Conversion to Dalvik format failed: Unable to execute dex: Multiple dex files define Lcom/google/android/gms/R$attr; If you configure t

You cannot return multiple times in a function. If you need to return more than one value you can do something like: return array('author'=>$this->author, 'bookName'=>$this->bookName); And use it like this: $res = $obj->getproperty(); echo "Author is ".$res['author']; echo "Book is ".$res['bookName']; You may want to change this depending on what the method is for/ how it will be used.

Let's say you have a class called enemy in your game. For the sake of brevity, I won't define the functions explicitly and will just use pass statements as placeholders. class Enemy: def __init__(self): pass def update(self): pass def draw(self, display_surface): pass To create multiple enemies you just need to do create a list of enemies where you will store all your reference to your currently active enemy objects. enemies = [] To add a single enemy, you just append a call of the constructor of enemy to your list. You can do this as many times as you want. enemies.append(Enemy()) As @monkey also mentioned in the comments, you can easily use list comprehension to set your list of active enemies to multiple object instances at once. enemies =

Choosing from the two options I'd choose the "friend" one, because it doesn't need several additional lines of code, the logic is compacted (not split in two separate classes) and because it fulfills your need. A polymorphic solution could be however implemented to "hide" from the plugin user the unneeded code. So my solution could be a mixture from those two: class A_base { friend class GlobalList; public: A_base(int v) : val(v) {} int get() { return val; } private: int v; void set(int v) { val = v; } }; class A : public A_base { public: A(int v) : A_base(v) { GlobalList::register(this); } }; and GlobalList must have a list of A * (or similar). GlobalList have direct access of every A and A_base methods and fields, public, protected and private ones

Exposing two properties which return different enumerators is probably the right way to go. Instead of your data structure implementing IEnumerable itself (I'm guessing with that one), create two different IEnumerator implementations, and have a propery exposed from the main class for each one. Then the using code is straightforward: foreach( var item in data.FastEnumerator ) { .... foreach( var item in data.LexicalEnumerator ) { ....

Just remove the spaces in your selector: $('.wijmo-wijsuperpanel-vbar-buttontop.ui-state-default.ui-corner-tr').remove(); With the spaces, it would select elements with ui-corner-tr class inside an element with ui-state-default class inside an element with wijmo-wijsuperpanel-vbar-buttontop class.

In your setTimeout function, this is the window. Try this instead: http://jsfiddle.net/uXVAs/ $(".content" ).each(function(){ var $this = $(this); var time = $this.data("time"); setTimeout(function() { $this.hide("slow"); }, time); });

Multiple Constructors To have multiple constructors on the generated class you need all the constructor parameters specified in the :constructors option of gen-class, and the :init function should be multi-arity to match. Something like the following: (ns something-amazing (:gen-class :init myconstructor :state state :constructors {[String] [] [String String] []})) (defn -myconstructor ([^String p1] [[] {:name p1 :special false}]) ([^String p1 ^String p2] [[] {:name p1 :special p2}])) In this case, both constructors would call the same zero-parameter super-type constructor, as specified by the empty vector values in the :constructor hash-map. Multiple States State is generally a hash-map, so you don't need multiple state

obj must be declared as Last *, or at least Inter * Inter *obj = new Last; or Last *obj = new Last; If obj is just a CI *, the compiler can't see the parseData() method (your object is instantiated as Last, but immediately implicitly converted to CI and looses the benefit of the method). I suggest that you look for what the notion of upcast means. (See also about implicit conversion here or else)...

No, that's not possible, you can nest them, but that's about it: With something1 .property1 = value With something2 .property2 = .property1 'something2.property2 = something1.property1 End Width End With And it is really easy to get lost using this approach, especially if there're common properties between objects, so it is not recommended.

you could also use instanceof operator to check which Observable class called an update, eg: @Override public void update(Observable observable, Object data) { if (observable instanceof ObservableClass1) { //prcess ObservableCLass1 update here } else if (observable instanceof ObservableClass2) { //process ObservableClass update here } else { //some default action or error } }

It depends on how parentClass.php is loaded. Unless you use require_once or include_once the file will be included multiple times, which in return will lead to a Fatal Error, as each class may only be defined once. If you are using an autoloader the file will only be included once, as it will only load unknown classes.

A simple implementation would be to keep a counter outside loop and increment it before appending it to output file name int counter = 0; for(File f:files){ String path = f.getName(); System.out.println("The Name of file is="+path); counter++; //increment the counter cc.createPdf("path" , "output"+counter, true); // append it to output System.out.println("the file is ="+output+".pdf"); System.out.println("after convert"); } For more robustness, counter can be replaced by UUID generator, System time in milliseconds etc

listTableVC *secondViewController = (listTableVC *)[[navigationController viewControllers] objectAtIndex:0]; Should be maybe: listTableVC *secondViewController = (listTableVC *)[[navigationController viewControllers] objectAtIndex:1]; ?

If you store your WebSocketClient object in the Application class you would not have to have Singleton. You could just get it from getApplicationContext() method in activities and use its methods as they are. That being said, if you will implement Singleton, I would suggest using INSTANCE variable in enum instead of getInstance() method. You can find example at following url: What is the best approach for using an Enum as a singleton in Java?

You want include guards around the header: #ifndef RTPSOCKET_H #define RTPSOCKET_H // header contents go here #endif This will prevent the header contents from being included more than once per source file, so you will not accidentally get multiple definitions. UPDATE: Since you say you have include guards, then possible causes of the error might be: misspelling the include guard name, so it doesn't work defining something with the same name in another header (or the source file that includes it) undefining the include guard name. But without seeing code that reproduces the error, I can only guess what might be wrong.

You forget to add your code into document.ready $(function(){ $('#myTab a').click(function (e) { e.preventDefault() $(this).tab('show') }); $('#myTab2 a').click(function (e) { e.preventDefault() $(this).tab('show') }); });

It's not multiple inheritance it's multi level inheritance. Classes can extend one other class, which can extend one other class, ..., which ultimately extends Object: A --> B --> C --> Object Multiple inheritance would be A ----> B --> C This means that when a method or a field is used inside A, it's looked up in A, then in B, then in C, then in Object. With multiple inheritance, it would have to be looked up in A, then in B and C, and there could be a conflict because the same method or field could exist in both superclasses.

If you need to inject several beans which implement the same interface into your service - check this answer, it may be what you are looking for. Simple approach would be: interface DevService { void add(Device d); String getName(); } @Service("devServiceLocal") class DevServiceLocalImpl implements DevService { void add(Device d) {...} String getName() {return "local";} } class Controller { @Autowired Collection<DevService> services; void doSomethingWithService() { // TODO: Check type somehow String servType = "local"; for(DevService s: services) { if(servType.equals(s.getName()) { // Call service methods break; } } } }

This works: <applet height="x" width="y" archive="your-package.jar" code="your-main-class.class"> your-main-class.class is the class which extends JApplet. If there are problems, check if the applet jar can be downloaded via browser. Here's a link on how to properly create jar file: http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/deployment/jar/build.html

NOTE This solution won't work for the OP (original poster), but I'll leave it here for future readers that may be looking at how to do this when implementing a new service. The only way I can think of to do that is to create an new interface that inherits the other interfaces, like this: public interface IMasterService : IService1, IService2, IService3 { } Then you can implement IMasterService in your service and only need a single endpoint: public class MainService : IMasterService { } serviceHost.AddServiceEndpoint(typeof(IMasterService), binding, address1); Now you have a single interface (IMasterService) that you can use with ChannelFactory<T>: ChannelFactory<ServiceLibrary.IMasterService> channelFactory = new ChannelFactory<IMasterService>(binding, address

Well if your layout is same then you can use the same Activity, but then the code might get complex. Are the ListView items dynamically generated as in the case of Google Maps Places, or are the options specifically decided by you beforehand? If the case is the former then you have to fetch data from a database as you can't code for all possiblities, and if it is the latter you can explicitly code too. After that on the next page if you use database, then fetch data from a SQLite database, or if its the latter case use Intent.getExtra(data) for each data and assign those values to the Textfields. If I understood your question, this should work.

Let's start with, this is not how Applets are used, in for that fact, how UI's are used... You problem stems from the fact that you seem "think" you control the paint process... objectName.paint(null); But you are passing a null value to the paint method. Apart from the fact that you should never have a need to call paint directly, I'm not sure what you expected paint to do... public void paint(Graphics g){ g.drawLine(10, 20, 50, 60 ); } g is null... Firstly, forget about applets, seriously, UI's and Swing are complicated enough with adding the complexity of applets to the problem. Secondly, take a read through Creating a GUI with Swing... Swing has it's own mechanisms for getting user input, so you can drop the Scanner...

You need to go into the config.js and set CKEDITOR.config.allowedContent = true; This way you will stop the CKEditor from stripping off the classes from your elements. Which version of CKEditor are you using? If the problem started happening when you updated CKEditor library to 4.1 then in the "Advanced options" section of CKEditor profile add this: config.allowedContent = true; If you still have problem with this please refer to the CKEditor API Documentation which states everything that you will need about this.