In your AddEnd function in the else clause, when you exit the while loop, temp is now NULL. However, the element before it is still pointing to NULL. Try something like temp = *head; if (temp->next == NULL) { temp->next = new; } else { while((temp->next) != null) { temp = temp->next; } temp->next = new; } in your else clause. (This, and the apparent issue with your understanding of malloc referenced by the others, new should be a Item * and the malloc call should be malloc(sizeof(Item)). You also don't need to cast the return value of malloc (indeed, there are some pitfalls that happen if you do).) Reading your typedefs a little more closely, new should actually be an Item (since it's a pointer to a List struct and you have typedef List* Item). T

The problem was with the return type, i.e. the scope of a variable which in this case is a pointer variable. mbratch also pointed out this, thank you very much, but actually before reading mbratch's comment, I suddenly remembered a point from a lecture note about "accessing an object outside of its lifetime" which I think is different from "call by value/call by reference" problem. Just some clarifications for people who may run into this problem and may get confused: since we are allocating memory for the struct newNode INSIDE the function pushToList (even though using dynamic memory allocation command), the memory assigned to this variable would be free/destroyed when the function ends and the control returns back to the callee function (in this case, main()). So you should set the retu

You probably got that from forgetting to set a previous or next ptr to NULL. Here I fixed the logic a little and got rid of the segfault (i tried to comments as best as i could on what each case being checked is): #include <iostream> #include <string.h> class doubled { private: class sublink { private: char data[30]; sublink *next_ptr; sublink *previous_ptr; friend doubled; }; public: sublink *first_ptr; doubled(){first_ptr = NULL;}; void add_item(char *item); void rm_item(char *item); }; void doubled::add_item(char *item) { sublink *new_data; new_data = new sublink; strcpy(new_data->data, item); // empty list case if(first_ptr == NULL) { // Only item in the list, I have

Looks like you assign pointers a bit wrong when deleting elements inside collection (not first one). Try to use assignment: trailCurrent.link = current.link; instead of just: trailCurrent = current.link;

You add an extra Node field to each Node that holds its previous Node Insertion Pseudocode: insert(Node n, index i) { currentIndex = 0 currentNode = head while (currentIndex < i) { currentNode = currentNode.next currentIndex++ } n.prev = currentNode n.next = currentNode.next currentNode.next = n }

You must set the z-index of the clicked 'li' higher and in return the former clicked 'li' back. Here is the example: fiddle And here the script: var oldli; $('li').click( function(){ $(oldli).toggleClass('displayNone displayBlock'); $(oldli).css("z-index","1"); $(this).toggleClass('displayBlock displayNone'); $(this).css("z-index","5"); oldli=$(this); } );

There are some issues in your addTeam function: template<class data> void LinkedList<data>::add(data a) { Node<data> *nodePtr; nodePtr=new Node<data>(a); // this should not be necessary, do that in the constructor of Node nodePtr->setNextPointer(0); if(head==0) // if head is empty { head=nodePtr; // make the new node the first node // this is not necessary, nodePtr already has been set up above // not to have a next node // head->setPreviousPointer(0); // make the new node point to null } else { // this check will never fail; what do you want to check here? if(nodePtr==0) // if head is null { last=0; // if list unoccupied _last is null }

Modify a[0]: >>> a = ['spam', 'eggs', 100, 1234] >>> a[0] = [a[0], 'Devon'] >>> a [['spam', 'Devon'], 'eggs', 100, 1234] For your updated question: >>> items = ['devon', 'baloney'] >>> a = ['spam', 'eggs', 100, 1234] >>> a[0] = [a[0]] + items >>> a [['spam', 'devon', 'baloney'], 'eggs', 100, 1234] If you're not sure about the position of 'spam' then use a list comprehension: >>> a = ['spam', 'eggs', 100, 1234] >>> [item if item != 'spam' else [item, 'devon'] for item in a] [['spam', 'devon'], 'eggs', 100, 1234]

The DataContext for each UI item in the ItemsControl will automatically be assigned to the corresponding Data Item in the source Collection. Therefore this is valid and will work: <ItemsControl x:Name ="Signalviewer_Control" ItemsSource="{Binding Source = {StaticResource signal_data}, Path = list_of_signals}"> <ItemsControl.ItemTemplate> <DataTemplate> <wpfExp:SignalViewer Signal="{Binding}"/> </DataTemplate> </ItemsControl.ItemTemplate> </ItemsControl>

In your function start, you are going through two List of type T. But then, you're concatenating a whole list with a value of the other list, while you're concatenating two lists in your Concat method. Also, you are passing the parameters by copy, which probably not something you want to do. I think what you meant to do is something like that : void Start(List< List <T> > & L, List<T> &NewList) Passing by copy means that your program send a copy of the parameter to your function. It means that the list you pass will be copied (which can be pretty heavy, if your list is big), and that only the copy will be modified. On the new version of the Start function that I gave you, you can notice that I added &. It means that the value is passed by reference. B

What I would do is, instead of having a linked list of linked lists of books, just have a linked list of late books within your user class. Then you can add methods to add/delete books from the list as you see fit. This approach makes more sense to me because the late books are essentially owned by the user, and this way you don't have to keep track of a user's late books by matching indices and tying them to another linked list.

You can start like this: node *replaceChar(node *head, char key, char *str) { node *cur, prev; for (cur = head, prev = NULL; cur != NULL; prev = cur, cur = cur->next) if (cur->ch == key) { node *hstart = toString(str); for (node *hend = hstart; hend->next != NULL; hend = hend->next) ; if (prev == NULL) head = hstart; else prev->next = hstart; hend->next = cur->next; free(cur); } } My assumptions: Your node struct is like: sturct node { char ch; struct node* next; }; toString(str) works perfectly fine.

Edit Sprints should contain PBIs not Tasks. Assuming you meant PBIs (which contain Tasks) then here's a method for doing it in TFS 2013. Using the web interface, you drag it. This assumes you have: The left sidebar list of sprints is visible. You are looking at the future sprint that contains the PBI to be moved. You have expanded the twisty for the current sprint. To do the drag you click anywhere on the PBI, say the Title, and hold a moment. Move the mouse a bit and you'll see a ghostly rectangle representing that item. You can continue the drag over to the future sprint and release the right mouse button. The PBI and all of its tasks are moved to the iteration path of the future sprint. You can also edit the PBI and each Task in it, but that's tedious and slows down the commitment

simple one: select "ITEMID", case when min("STATUS") in (4, 5) and max("STATUS") in (4, 5) then 'True' else 'False' end as requirements_met from table1 group by "ITEMID" better one: select "ITEMID", sum(case when "STATUS" in (4, 5) then 1 else 0 end) as MET_REQUIREMENTS, sum(case when "STATUS" in (4, 5) then 0 else 1 end) as NOT_MET_REQUIREMENTS from table1 group by "ITEMID"; sql fiddle demo

Use tolerance: 'pointer' like this: $('ul').sortable({ handle: '.move', tolerance: 'pointer' }); Updated jsFiddle

You have two choices to achieve this: Either return a value from your validate methods and check the value in acitonPerformed. If validated then only move to the next method. You can achieve this by putting few if/else statements Or you can create validate exception classes. If your validate method is not able to validate then it should throw an exception which you can catch in your action performed. If you put all the validate method in the try block then if a method throws the exception you can skip other methods as you reach the catch block. I am not sure whether I correctly understand your second problem. As I understand you want to continue with the program even if your addFile method throws an exception. For that case you need to wrap your addFile method call in a separate try c

Since you're checking if the NEXT value is null, when you hit your last value, you'll break out of your merge while loop. Outside of this while loop, you should just append the other list onto the other one. So if List1 runs out of elements and List2 has 3 more, instead of walking through List2, just make (end of List1)->next = (Where you left off in List2). Also, don't return in the merge function. You don't need to. since yoru lists already occupy space, you're just switching around where their pointers are pointing. Once all the pointers are done, just return from the function an access List1/List2 like you normally would (except you need to figure out which List contains the first pointer, so just return 1 or 2) also, you don't ever set merge to a value I don't think

if ptr is the first element in the list to delete, you set first to null, not to the next of ptr. (sideeffect: you are not able to free the the rest of the list) your EDITH: delete should return the new Head, better make it a struct node **first parameter which changes the first element if the first is the deleted one BTW: never cast the result of malloc. BTW two. why use for-loop? everybody uses while-loop with linked lists BTW three: normal variable names for linked lists are "head", "list", "next", "prev", "last" with the nice side-affect, they are all the same length, so making it neatly aligned.

The QGraphicsAnimation class is deprecated. What you want is an adapter between a QPainterPath and the animation system. See below for a complete example. Using painter paths for animations requires some extra smoothing (resampling) as there will be velocity changes along the path, and it won't look all that great. You may notice it when you run the code below. Painter paths are meant for painting, not for animating stuff. The extent of this misbehavior will depend on the kind of path you're using, so it may end up working OK for the particular use case you have. #include <QApplication> #include <QAbstractAnimation> #include <QPainterPath> #include <QGraphicsScene> #include <QGraphicsView> #include <QGraphicsEllipseItem> #include <QDebug> class

Try following query.it will work properly . WITH TEMP AS ( SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY ID2 ORDER BY ID1) AS ID , * FROM LOCATION ) SELECT A.ID1, A.ID2 , B.LOCATION , A.LOCATION FROM TEMP AS A LEFT OUTER JOIN TEMP AS B ON A.ID -1 = B.ID AND A.ID2 = B.ID2 UNION ALL SELECT A.ID1,A.ID2 , A.LOCATION , NULL FROM TEMP AS A WHERE PATHTYPE = 'FINISH' ORDER BY ID1 sqlFiddle

You've already got the basic idea - sum the weights (which happen to be the same as your values here) and take a random number in that range - although I'd use 0 as the lower bound, and the sum as the exclusive upper bound. Then you just need to work through the list to find out which value that corresponds to... begin at the start of the list, and keep checking whether the random number is less than the current item's weight: if it is, that's the selected item. If it isn't, subtract the weight from the random number, and move on. That's an O(N) algorithm, admittedly. If you need to take a random number from the same list multiple times, you could build an accumulated weight list, and then do a binary search to find out which index corresponds with which random number... but I'd stick to

Without seeing your db schema, very difficult to guess. But it might look something like this: DELETE FROM `order` WHERE orders.productID = 456 AND orders.orderID = 123

You need to do two things: Use the {upsert:1} flag on update to insert particular date document if it doesn't already exist. Use {$inc} operator to increment your item values. It turns out that if you increment a field that doesn't exist by 1 it will be created with value 1 (it's as if it existed with value 0). You may not be able to get the above accomplished with the schema you currently have. In order to increment a counter it has to be the name - i.e. "a":1, "b":17, etc. You currently have it as key:"name", counter:"value" which means you can only update them with positional operator. But positional operator requires that you match an element in order to successfully update it, so there goes the strategy to use $inc So it looks like if you want to do this in a single update st

You are referencing to $rs_pa['ID'] on this line: $mysql_select_child = "SELECT * FROM $mysql_table_items WHERE `Parent` = '" . $rs_pa['ID'] . "' AND Active = 1 ORDER BY `Order` ASC"; Are you sure $rs_pa['ID'] is defined at that point? Something like this should work better: $mysql_table_items = "sys_menu_top"; $mysql_table_options = "sys_options"; // SQL QUERY $mysql_result_number = mysql_query("SELECT VALUE FROM $mysql_table_options WHERE Name LIKE 'nav_menu_elements_on_line_usr'") or die($myQuery . "<br/><br/>" . mysql_error()); $mysql_select_parent = "SELECT * FROM $mysql_table_items WHERE `Parent` = '0' AND Type LIKE 'top' AND Active = 1 ORDER BY `Order` ASC"; // SQL RESULT $mysql_result_number = mysql_fetch_array($mysql_result_number, MYSQL_ASS

Check this its working for me. config : { refs : { navigationview : 'navigationview', }, control : { 'productTable dataview[id=productDataView]':{ itemsingletap : 'onProductItemTap' } } }, onProductItemTap: function (list, idx, target, record, evt) { Ext.Msg.alert('itemsingletap', record.data.Content); Ext.select('#resultID').elements[0].innerHTML = record.data.Content; },

One thing I'd try is to build the URL programmatically using Ruby's built-in URI class: require 'ostruct' require 'uri' # # set up some variables just for example values # list = OpenStruct.new('id' => 'some_list_id') item = OpenStruct.new('foursquare_id' => 'some_foursquare_id') ENV['FOURSQUARE_TOKEN'] = 'foo' uri = URI.parse("https://api.foursquare.com/v2/lists/#{ list.id }/deleteitem") uri.query = URI.encode_www_form( 'itemId' => item.foursquare_id, 'oauth_token' => ENV['FOURSQUARE_TOKEN'], 'v' => 20120321, ) uri.to_s => "https://api.foursquare.com/v2/lists/some_list_id/deleteitem?itemId=some_foursquare_id&oauth_token=foo&v=20120321" The reason this is a good idea, is that some values have to be encoded in a URL. Simply shoving them into a string wo

For the information you can use this code for the dialog box and this can be called by showSettingsAlert(); wherever you want this dialog box to displayed. public void showSettingsAlert(){ AlertDialog.Builder alertDialog = new AlertDialog.Builder(this); // Setting Dialog Title alertDialog.setTitle("Title here"); // Setting Dialog Message alertDialog.setMessage("here the information can be display"); alertDialog.setNegativeButton("OK", new DialogInterface.OnClickListener() { public void onClick(DialogInterface dialog, int which) { dialog.cancel(); } }); // Showing Alert Message alertDialog.show(); } for the other thing look Contextual Action Mode. these li

Right, I'll preface this by saying that I couldn't get it to work properly in jsfiddle because it doesn't reload the page when the named links are clicked however, I believe this should help $('.dropdown-menu li a').each(function() { if($(location).attr('href').indexOf($(this).attr('href')) > 0) { $('.dropdown-menu').show(); } }); So what we're doing here is checking the link href on each list item and checking if it is contained within the page link. If any of them are matched, the dropdown will be set to show. Since bootstrap uses visibility and show() uses display:block, the show() should override the visibility: hidden when you stop hovering See how you go - you might need to modify it slightly for your own purpose http://jsfiddle.net/yZ8C6/1/ You can get the

Use this JavaScript code: $(function() { $('#changeEN').hide(); $('.newDropdownLanguage li').click(function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $('#current-language').text($(this).text()); $('.newDropdownLanguage li').show(); $('#changeEN').show(); // Actually it should work without this line, but I don't get why it is not working. $(this).hide(); }); }); Don't forget to add one <li> for English: <li><a id="changeEN" href="#">English</a></li>

That's easy. in your AssetSummaryPageModel-Bean you will add a new method with the @PostConstruct annotation so it will be called after the bean has been constructed. In this method you will set selectedSensorId to the first item of your childFacilitySelectionList. When your page is being rendered, JSF will see that a value was already selected and will set this one as the selected one. @PostConstruct public void init() { selectedSensorId = childFacilitySelectionList.get(0); }

You can create an index like: var index = {'101-01-071-02':0,'101-14-001-01':1,'106-01-002-01':2}; Then you can find the LI something like: var value = '106-01-002-01'; var lis = document.getElementById('AllProducts').getElementsByTagName('li'); if (value in index) { var theOne = lis[index[value]]; } Note that getElementsByTagName returns a live NodeList, so you can get the collection once then modify the list of LIs in the DOM all you like, the collection will always reflect the LIs that are the descendants of "AllProducts". You could also use an array with indexOf. Edit Here's a fiddle that does the job: http://jsfiddle.net/jPKtz/. It builds the index, selects the product if the product serial number is correct, and clears previous entries.

What you want to do is bind your ListBox to you List of employees. This post shows the binding and the comments shows the removing code as well. The idea is that when you remove an item from the DataSource, then you won't see it in the ListBox. Binding Listbox to List<object> The problem with the DeleteRecord() method is that the lstRecords object you just created isn't the ListBox that is on the form.

if (RadUpload1.UploadedFiles.Count > 1) { for (int fileBuffer = 0; fileBuffer < RadUpload1.UploadedFiles.Count-1; fileBuffer++) { for (int fileList = fileBuffer + 1; fileList < RadUpload1.UploadedFiles.Count; fileList++) { if (RadUpload1.UploadedFiles[fileBuffer] != RadUpload1.UploadedFiles[fileList]) { //....

Update: The Edit Task dialog now opens the item as expected. I am not sure why. I may have changed a list setting related to email notifications on change of assignment. HTH /bac

You are adding the class hoverblock to all the li elements when you click on a link. The hover handler is written to ignore li.unrun_tab elements that have the hoverblock class. If you want the hover behavior to persist after you have clicked on an item in the product list, you have to either remove the code in your click handler that adds the hoverblock class, or remove the code in your hover handler that excludes class '.hoverblock` from hover processing. It's a bit unclear what you want the behavior to be. What you are describing seems to be that you want a click on a product to do nothing with respect to the adjacent images.

This is a fairly simple operation with LINQ. The first step is to order the list by DateTime (Item3), after that you can just chain First() on the query and it will return the most recent item. Note that LINQ operations are not done in place, meaning the order of itmes in myList will not be affected by this operation. It will create a new IEnumerable that is order by tuple.Item3 then give you the first item from that. Tuple<string, string, DateTime> mostRecent = myList.Orderby(x => x.Item3).First(); To add a restriction on group you simply need to add a where clause. Tuple<string, string, DateTime> mostRecent = myList.Where(y => y.Item2 == "Programmer").Orderby(x => x.Item3).First(); I'd recommend checking out the docs on the LINQ to Objects query operators. Ever

Try using LINQ: this.drivers.Where(d => d.Name == name).ToList().ForEach(delegate(Driver d) { // Do something }); If the names are unique, this will be easier to use: var driver = this.drivers.Single(d => d.Name == name); // Do something with driver Alternatively, you can use a loop: foreach(var d in this.drivers) { if(d.Name == name) { // Do something } } If your items will always be ordered "1W","2W",..., those will help you identify the index: var index = int.Parse(name[0].ToString()) - 1; // e.g. "3W"[0].ToString() = "3" var driver = this.drivers[index]; // Do something

Your need to pass the address of head for your function to modify it. Then your function needs to dereference this address. Further, the last pop() needs to change *AddressOfHead as well Node *pop(Node **AddressOfHead) { Node *temp = *AddressOfHead; if (temp) { *AddressOfHead = temp->next; } return temp; } ... // Usage example Node *TopOfList = pop(&Head);

Typically, head and tail will be null pointers for an empty list so dereferncing them like this: head->previous = NULL; will be undefined behaviour. The constructor would simply be: List::List() : head(0), tail(0), count(0) {} (or use nullptr for head and tail if your C++ is advanced enough). If your the type of person who likes dummy nodes at the start and end of your lists, you will need to allocate them before trying to use them: List::List() : count(0) { head = new somethingOrOther(); tail = new somethingOrOther(); head->previous = NULL; head->next = tail; tail->previous = head; tail->next = NULL; } This trick is often used to greatly simplify list insertions and deletions since you never have to worry about whether you're insertin

There are multiple issues, to start with callLog = malloc(dataRow+1 * sizeof(callLog)); change it to callLog = malloc(dataRow+1 * sizeof(*callLog)); Either initialize callLog[0].outBoundLegs to 0 as memset(callLog[0].outBoundLegs, 0, sizeof(*callLog[0].outBoundLegs)) or use calloc() callLog[0].outBoundLegs = calloc(1, sizeof(node)); callLog[0].outBoundLegs->target = "0"; Don't initialize strings that way, do callLog[0].outBoundLegs->target = strdup("0"); However, remember to free the memory when appropriate.