After placing the issue on github I received the answer I was looking for. This can be found HERE! Protractor requires that Angular be present on the page and the way around this is to use the driver directly. Following the link above should stear anyone stuck on the same issue in the right direction. Kudos to JulieMR and the others who helped out with this issue.

Just in case someone else has a similar problem to mine, here's the solution I came up with. It isn't pretty, but it works. I created a basic Spring MVC web application with a request mapping that looks exactly like the endpoint from the original service. In the controller class, parse the input, get the result records from the database, then manually construct the xml string from the data: @RequestMapping(value = "/getNewService", method = RequestMethod.POST) public ModelAndView getNewServicePost() { StringWriter writer = new StringWriter(); try { IOUtils.copy(request.getInputStream(), writer, "UTF-8"); } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } String theString = writer.toString(); int pNum = XMLUtil.extractNum(theString); List<Object&

hmmm. You could try mockMvc.perform(get("/user-byName").sessionAttr("userClientObject", userClientObject)) .andExpect(status().isOk()); to setup userClientObject in test fixture. What does "return getUserByName(userClient, firstName, lastName);" exactly do? If it doesn't involve external dependence, just assert your return in andExpect(jsonPath()) clause. I thought it should be @SessionAttribute by the way.

Why bother with splitting the whole string and making copies of every token along the way since you will throw them in the end (because you only need the first token)? In your very specific case, just use std::string::find(): std::string s = "one two three"; auto first_token = s.substr(0, s.find(' ')); Note that if no space character is found, your token will be the whole string. (and, of course, in C++03 replace auto with the appropriate type name, ie. std::string)

Generate a DIV dynamically: $('body').append('<div>'); Access the DIV immediately after generation: var $divElement = $('body').append('<div>').find('div'); Get the last child: var $lastChildElement = $divElement.last(); Get the HTML of the last child (more specifically, the innerHTML): var $lastChildHTML = $lastChildElement.html(); Do it all together then you turn around: var $lastChildHTML = $('body').append('<div>').find('div').last().html(); That's what it's all about.

.andExpect(jsonPath("$.user").value("john")); with dependency : <dependency> <groupId>com.jayway.jsonpath</groupId> <artifactId>json-path</artifactId> <version>0.8.1</version> </dependency> and one static import like this import static org.springframework.test.web.servlet.result.MockMvcResultMatchers.*; adds the static method...

The problem is foundId = $('section:contains('+query+')').attr('id'); will not return anything since the section elements are not present in the main.html Try $(document).ready(function() { $('#search-submit').click(function(e){ var query = $("#search-box").val();; e.preventDefault(); if (query.length > 0) { $.get('info.html', function(html){ var $html = $(html); $("#info_display").empty().append($html.find('section:contains('+query+')').first()) }, 'html') } else { alert("Oops, you forgot to enter a search term."); } }); });

Character classes match single characters. You need to repeat them: var exp = new RegExp("^([a-z]*)$"); console.log( exp.test('hello') ); console.log( /^([a-z0-9]*)$/.test('abc12') ); Or if you want to require at least one character, use + instead of *. Also, if you're just using the patterns with test, you can get rid of the parentheses: var exp = new RegExp("^[a-z]*$"); console.log( exp.test('hello') ); console.log( /^[a-z0-9]*$/.test('abc12') );

You need to correct your syntax errors. Use onclick instead of onClick (pedantic). Make sure you close your attributes properly, you are missing a few closing " marks. updated html <span onclick="changeNavigation('members')" >MEMBERS</span> <span onclick="changeNavigation('help')" >HELP</span>` <div id="members">...</div> <div id="help" style="display: none;">...</div> There is also an error with your logic as you are simply replacing the contents of div#members with itself. Updated JS without syntax errors, but still with dodgy logic function changeNavigation(id){ document.getElementById('members').innerHTML=document.getElementById(id).innerHTML; } Demo fiddle http://jsfiddle.net/ADGCV/ As far as your actual question goes, can

I have implemented rijndael in the past, and here is my version if this is any help: private static string Encrypt(string plainText, string passPhrase, string saltValue, string hashAlgorithm, int passwordIterations, string initVector, int keySize) { // Convert strings into byte arrays. // Let us assume that strings only contain ASCII codes. // If strings include Unicode characters, use Unicode, UTF7, or UTF8 // encoding. var initVectorBytes = Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes(initVector); var saltValueBytes = Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes(saltValue); // Convert our plaintext into a byte array. // Let us assume that plaintext contains UTF8-encoded characters. var plainTextBytes = Encoding.

One way this could go wrong is if the calling code does something like: const char* s = ConvertToString(first).c_str(); And then stores s somewhere and accesses it later, thinking that the std::string object referenced by the return value of ConvertToString will never be destroyed. Of course, that calling code sucks anyway, in that case.

the syntax is incorrect if (Test-Connection -quiet PCNAME) { # bla bla bla } else { # bla bla bla } Also, powershell doesnt have an == operator, instead use -eq. for example if ($foo -eq 0) { ... } Similary: -ne not equals -gt greater than -gte greater than or equal to -lt less than -lte less than or equal to

Above the test, add this: var_dump($service->getId()); var_dump($discountsID[$i]); die(); And see if the outcome matches Also this seems wrong to me: foreach ($services as $service) { $service->getId() What does $services consist of?

The return statement returns a value from the entire method you're in. But you're in main, which can't return a value (it's void). If you want to end the while loop when you have a good value, then use the break statement to break out of the while loop. Control then passes to the next statement following the end of the loop.

In typing the question, I think I've realized the answer: to use the author's nomenclature, I should test the outgoing "command" messages that are sent in response to the incoming messages. For some context, the author later writes, "Many outgoing messages do have side effects (… an action is taken by an observer) upon which your application depends. These messages are commands and it is the respondibility of sending object to prove that they are properly sent." In my case, my object is a container that sends messages to its children when its state changes, so that object's test should ensure that those messages are sent to its children.

You have to keep track of whether the parser is currently "inside" an entry element or not. For example, you can add an integer property entryLevel to the class, set it initially to zero and update it in didStartElement and didEndElement: - (void)parser:(NSXMLParser *)parser didStartElement:(NSString *)elementName namespaceURI:(NSString *)namespaceURI qualifiedName:(NSString *)qualifiedName attributes:(NSDictionary *)attributeDict { if ([elementName isEqualToString:@"entry"]) { self.entryLevel++; } else if ([elementName isEqualToString:@"title"] && self.entryLevel > 0) { // title inside entry } } - (void)parser:(NSXMLParser *)parser didEndElement:(NSString *)elementName namespaceURI:(NSString *)namespaceURI qualifiedName:(NSString *)qName { if

No (unless things have changed); just loop through the list. An alternative is instead / as well have a lookup variable i.e. lookup. = 0 /* not all versions of Rexx support default initialisation like this */ .... addToList: parse arg item numberInList = numberInList + 1 list.numberInList = item lookup.item = 1 return You can then check if item is in the list by if lookup.item = 1 then do ......

You can always loop through your array prevObject and write an expectation within the loop. for(var i = 0; i < promise.length; i++) { expect(promise[i].innerHTML).toMatch(pattern); }

What about something like edit : try this: import re import subprocess website = "google.com" try: ping = subprocess.Popen(["ping", "-n", "-c 5", website], stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE) out, error = ping.communicate() if out: try: minimum = int(re.findall(r"Minimum = (d+)", out)[0]) maximum = int(re.findall(r"Maximum = (d+)", out)[0]) average = int(re.findall(r"Average = (d+)", out)[0]) packet = int(re.findall(r"Lost = (d+)", out)[0]) if packet > 1: packet = 5 / packet * 100 except: print "no data for one of minimum,maximum,average,packet" else: print 'No ping' except subprocess.CalledProcessError: print "Couldn't get a ping"

From http://www.sqaforums.com/showflat.php?Number=438836&page=0: Unfortunately, Mercury made extensive use of Variant types in their COM interfaces, and that's something that Interop seems to choke on a lot. This, and other non-obvious facts, lead to the type cast problems you experience. The key idea is to call the QTP routines via reflection, a la for exampletestObject.GetType().InvokeMember(), see the thread link for details. Also, if you have an active support agreement: there used to be a KB article, http://support.openview.hp.com/selfsolve/document/KM916723 ...the ID might lead to a fresher version.

Yeah, the E2E input() method is sort of a nuisance as it does a find based on the ng-model of a particular input.. So for situations like ng-repeat, it doesn't lend itself to any practical use. Good news is, you can get the functionality you want just using element(). element('my_element_here').val('Value I want to enter!') expect(element('my_element_here').val()).toEqual("Value I want to enter!") Basically, the element() call can be chained with any of these jQuery-esque methods: val, text, html, height, innerHeight, outerHeight, width, innerWidth, outerWidth, position, scrollLeft, scrollTop, offset. The E2E Test harness for Angular is... interesting. And in desperate need of some TLC. But it's actually pretty good at what it does, once you get over the awkwardness of it! (And assu

Ok, I revisited the Unit Testing section of docs. It seems that the response.contentAsString can be used only when you render your text directly. For rendering a view, you can check the item "Testing View Rendering" of the docs. Example: // Test class class SimpleController { def home() { render view: "homePage", model: [title: "Hello World"] } … } void testIndex() { controller.home() assert view == "/simple/homePage" assert model.title == "Hello World" }

The short answer is that the method resolution order is roughly "breadth first". That is, it goes through all the base classes at a given level of ancestry before going to any of their superclasses. So if D inherits from B and C, which both inherit from A, the MRO always has B and C before A. Another way to think about it is that if the order went B->A, then A.test would be called before C.test, even though C is a subclass of A. You generally want a subclass implementation to be invoked before the superclass one (because the subclass one might want to totally override the superclass and not invoke it at all). A longer explanation can be found here. You can also find useful information by googling or searching Stackoverflow for question about "Python method resolution order" or "Pytho

You could try this UDF: Public Function GetNumbers(sMark As String) As String 'regexp declaration Dim objRegExp As Object Set objRegExp = CreateObject("vbscript.regexp") With objRegExp .Global = True .Pattern = "(d+)D*" Dim i As Long If .Execute(sMark).Count > 1 Then For i = 0 To .Execute(sMark)(0).submatches.Count GetNumbers = GetNumbers & .Execute(sMark)(i).submatches(0) & "," Next Else GetNumbers = .Execute(sMark)(0).submatches(0) & "," End If End With GetNumbers = Left(GetNumbers, Len(GetNumbers) - 1) End Function it's tried and tested for examples you provided and hope it will work for all situations you need.

Instead of using ServeletActionContext.getResponse().getOutputStream().print("sample string"); return null; use this code PrintWriter out = response.getWriter(); out.write("sample string"); return null; This should work.

Answer to your question: No, is not possible because (from PreparedStatement javadoc) ResultSet executeQuery() throws SQLException Executes the SQL query in this PreparedStatement object and returns the ResultSet object generated by the query. and you can't change this signature. Your intention is to return the whole ResultSet in Array<>[] variable and, for large resultset, this can results in a OutOfMemoryException. You can think to use Spring JDBC support and JDBCTemplate.queryForList() to make use of ResultSet mapping easy EDIT: About your code best choice is to change query as: select Col3,MyOption from MyOption where OptionKey in (?,?,?,?) and ID = " + _Id"; while(rs.hasNext()) { String option = rs.getString(2); String optionValue = rs.getString(1); String pro

Why not use a regular expression? If a string has words and numbers in it, it must have letters and number characters. I don't entirely understand the logic in your question, so you may need to adjust the logic here. using System; using System.Text.RegularExpressions; ... string words = "1 2 c 5"; Match numberMatch = Regex.Match(words, @"[0-9]", RegexOptions.IgnoreCase); Match letterMatch = Regex.Match(words, @"[a-zA-Z]", RegexOptions.IgnoreCase); // Here we check the Match instance. if (numberMatch.Success && letterMatch.Success) { // there are letters and numbers }

I think that's by design. NUnit is designed to clean up the environment before any test, to generate same conditions for any test independent their execution order. If Test A would change the XDocument, Test B would be run with that changes. That might led to indeterminate test results. If Test B expects changes made from Test A, then your tests are not fully isolated, that's a bad practice. If you wan't to change that behaviour, implement a lazy field and load the test data only on first access. You can increase performance if you know that you are not changing data in any of your tests, but pay attention. private static Lazy<IEnumerable> testData = new Lazy<IEnumerable>(GetExample); private static IEnumerable GetExample() { var doc = XDocument.Load("Example.xml");

Split your type definition into two files with the first ending with: (caret)xsd:documentation(caret) and the second beginning with: (caret)/xsd:documentation(caret) Windows: type preamblefile 9000charfile postfile > testfile Linux: cat preamblefile 9000charfile postfile > testfile

You need to use the asynchronous support in mocha. Try adding done to the following line: describe('Should show uploaded files to amazon s3', function (done) { and you need to add done() below the console.log(res). Documentation is here: http://visionmedia.github.io/mocha/#asynchronous-code

By using a Reference (note: &) to the element, any changes will affect the original element: foreach ($dashboard as &$eDashboard) { $eDashboard['multimedia_descr'] = eSetDashboardLabel($eDashboard['multimedia_descr'], getLang()); } Alternatively, you can capture the key in the loop and reference the array: foreach ($dashboard as $key => $eDashboard) { $dashboard[$key]['multimedia_descr'] = eSetDashboardLabel($eDashboard['multimedia_descr'], getLang()); }

Create a lookup array for your data: $str = '"Harry":"12345","Biswas":"789456","garry":"56894"'; $passwords = array(); foreach( str_getcsv( $str) as $entry) { list( $name, $pw) = explode( ':', $entry); $passwords[$name] = $pw; } Then, just use their name as the key to find their password: $fh = "Harry"; echo $passwords[$fh]; // 12345

if you have awk available, an awk oneliner could do it for you: awk '/July/{f=1} f&&/foobar/{print "Found foobar after July!";exit}' file if no July or no foobar after July, the command prints nothing. of course you could make an if-else, to let it print "not found" or something.

Check out EventFiringWebDriver which may help, http://onlineseleniumtraining.com/how-to-working-with-listeners-in-selenium-webdriver/

An asynchronous callback-based Http client for Android built on top of Apache’s HttpClient libraries. All requests are made outside of your app’s main UI thread, but any callback logic will be executed on the same thread as the callback was created using Android’s Handler message passing. Check http://loopj.com/android-async-http/ this may help you !

They are sent as string in both case. That's your framework that decodes the comma separated value list which results of the casting of the array to a string (try idArray.toString()). It probably does that based on the Content-Type header of the request. You can try to use the jsonData option of the request instead of params. If your framework accepts JSON, the typing of the data will be better respected.

Your inline onmouseover is passing the element's id when it should be passing a reference to the element itself. Try this: onmouseover="hover(this);" Also, optionally, you can eliminate the global element variable: function hover(hoveredElement) { setInterval(function() { hoveredElement.style.boxShadow = .... ; }, 100); } Or if you want to keep the other function separate: function hover(hoveredElement){ setInterval(function(){ changeBack(hoveredElement); }, 100); } function changeBack(element){ element.style.boxShadow = .... ; } Either way means you can apply the onmouseover="hover(this);" to multiple elements without them sharing the same global element variable.

It's simple: you have no root element. Every XML file requires a root element, otherwise the markup isn't valid!

I believe the solution is to use the curlies: $ if ! { [[ a == a ]] && [[ a == c ]]; }; then echo yy; fi yy I wonder if there is anything more elegant.

Try .appendTo() var addNewCategory = function(number) { var categoryId = (number % 2 == 0 ? 'even' : 'odd'), category = '<div class="category" id="category_' + categoryId + '">' + categoryId + '</div>'; return $(category).appendTo(content) };